On why we’ve stopped grading lesson observations..

On why we’ve stopped grading lesson observations….

This term, after a round of lesson observations, I found myself reflecting on where we were as a school. I am coming to the end of my 4th year as HT in the school and was thinking how we could become a ‘great’ school. Our school has had its challenges in the past. We got a ‘Satisfactory’ in early 2010 shortly after I had taken charge and we have worked incredibly hard to improve what we were doing. In March this year we got a ‘Good’ from OFSTED and we were delighted that we had an external validation of what we had known for a while.

For those of you that know me, you will know that I am not that fussed about OFSTED. That isn’t to say I don’t think that their judgements are important-they are-I just don’t run my school for OFSTED. Our school is run for our students, parents, local community and staff. That is what is important.I have always been confident that OFSTED would be happy with what we did but my school is not set up for OFSTED.

Back to my reflections!

It became apparent to me that if we were to become a ‘great’ school then this would have very little to do with the structural aspects of the school. Improvements in the ‘structural’ aspects of the school helped us get to good. To become ‘great’ we actually had to encourage our staff to move away from the structures that had got us to be ‘good’ and give them the opportunity to develop and exercise their teaching skills in a supportive and collaborative environment. One in where all staff shared good practice, built on what was really good about their teaching and, if appropriate, be encouraged to take risks and try new things.

It became apparent to me that the main reason for grading lesson observations was down to providing OFSTED with information. We spoke about it at SLT and decided that our current structure was not going to make us a great school. To be great we need staff to engage about what they are finding difficult and ask for support. This would never happen if we graded observations. Staff (quite rightly) would choose groups/sets that would give them a good/outstanding judgements in previous lesson observations. They would never pick groups that they found challenging because of the levels of accountability based on the lesson judgement.

To be better we need to reflect on our practice in a non judgemental way. To improve our excellent teachers by getting them to reflect on issues that, in the past, would be hidden. Let’s work together to develop practice in areas we hid because if we looked at it during a lesson obs previously we would be graded inadequate. We need to move on from that.

We took the decision to remove grading from our lesson observations to make us better teachers. To remove the fear of being judged inadequate. To encourage our teachers to take risks. To encourage our teachers to be the best they can be and deliver lessons that they may not normally do. To encourage our staff to be truly great. To be great we cannot be worried about failing, indeed to be great we actually have to experience failure to get to this level. Great teaching exists where our best teachers exert their professionalism to ensure that our students succeed. We believe that this approach will improve the outcomes for our students. We believe that this will make us better teachers.

I have discussed this with some colleagues who have said that our decision is ‘brave’. I disagree, I believe it is right. I spoke about this with an OFSTED inspector who was concerned about ‘accountability’. I actually think that this model increases accountability. By sharing our practices, by working together to improve those lessons that we struggle with and by looking at those groups we find challenging actually increases accountability. It is brave to try and improve the outcomes for our students and accountability lies on what we get for our students. I think our approach will definitely improve the outcomes for our students.

We are professionals. We know what works. We know what we need to do to make our practice better. We must make these improvements away from the fear of being labelled to be failing. One of my sporting heroes is the basketball player Michael Jordan. As a mad basketball fan I admired his technical ability, his unbelievable court presence and his seemingly amazing ability to make the winning shot. It was only after listening to him about what made him a truly great player that I tripped over this:

‘I’ve missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I’ve lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I’ve been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I’ve failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.’

To be better we have to learn from our mistakes. But we can only learn from our mistakes when we are free from the risk of failure. Failure makes us better. But we can only be better if ‘failure’ is acceptable. If we have a system where ‘failure’ is discouraged then we will always have professionals who suffer from fear of failure. If we remove the gradings from observations then we encourage staff to take risks, we encourage staff to ‘fail’ whilst taking those risks and, ultimately, we create better teachers.

I am not saying that this approach will work for all schools. It may not. We are on a particular part of our journey and we feel it is right for us. We look forward to making our school a truly ‘great’ school and feel that this approach will help us.

That is why we have stopped grading our lesson observations.


17 thoughts on “On why we’ve stopped grading lesson observations..”

  1. Now that is true leadership.

    Congratulations on your successes thus far and good luck for the next leg of your journey.

    Thank you for an uplifting post.

  2. Bravo! I used to work in this sort of regime before OFSTED got SLT on the run. You are quite right FWIW provided that you have the currency of trust. I hope you can spread this creed it was so much more rewarding to use creativity and collaboration to be more effective rather than having to do it subversively whilst presenting someone’s idea of OFSTED’s view of an excellent lesson every six weeks.

  3. Excellent policy, this is exactly the sort of direction we need to be moving in as a profession. A few questions: did Ofsted ask you for a judgement on quality of teaching and learning in the school? How did you provide evidence to back up your judgement in the absence of graded lessons? How did Ofsted react to that?

    1. Hi Roy, we had our inspection in March this year and have moved to this policy this term so it is yet to be tested under the gaze of an OFSTED inspection. My position is that I believe that this approach will improve teaching and learning and, as a result, improve the outcomes for all our students. Not sure how OFSTED could disagree with that! Paul

  4. Thank you. You have reduced me to tears. You are so right.

    Today, in an ‘internal’ inspection by an external inspection consultant I got judged ‘good’ (with elements of ‘outstanding’) but I was made to feel I’d failed by the inspector because was told that when the real Ofsted came I needed to do better and get an outstanding. My students love my lessons, their results are off-the-planet brilliant and yet I have been made to feel I have ‘failed’. At this precise time I feel like giving up … and it’s not just me. Most of my colleagues feel the same.

    There is no support in my school, the managers bully us into doing what Ofsted want. We are overdue an Ofsted inspection and our managers are Ofsted-led.

    If you want to see an example of how to de-motivate all your staff come and see what they’ve done to us.

    1. I’m so sorry to hear this, sianna. I’d love to know more about why so many inspection teams are so negative. Keep the faith – you’re doing a great job under immense pressure. Flora

  5. I know that this is the right way to go but how do you convince SLT. Their first question will be “How are you actually judging the equality of teaching? And it’s mine as well

    1. I think that the quality of teaching needs to be looked at as a whole school. Results, observations, feedback (marking) etc will help give a picture. Faculty leaders extremely important in this process as well. Paul

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s